Aerial surveys can be used for multiple purposes, from assessing deforestation and pollution to town planning, fire control, disease mapping and multiple other data gathering needs. It is a quick way to gather a mass of information in a fairly short space of time that can subsequently be reviewed on the ground, in our particular case here to help with animal population understanding in our national parks. The data gathering can be via conventional still or video camera, infrared or thermal imaging cameras and for certain jobs such as terrain topography studies a new technique called Lidar, where an astonishing 750,000 point images per second are gathered to produce a highly accurate (+/- 1mm!) relief map of land or structures. All clever stuff.

Queen Elizabeth National Park aerial survey

At the moment animal counts are done more or less the same way that they have been for decades via aerial surveys, with a pilot flying over a prescribed route (known as transects) in a small plane such as a Cessna 182 at a specific height, taking multiple photographs with high res cameras that are fixed to the fuselage of the plane.

In the “old days” this was photographically expensive, as these photos all had to be developed from celluloid film and then printed onto photographic paper. Sometimes human counters sat in the back of the plane and just manually recorded what they (thought) they saw. You can imagine the drift-off of concentration in the hot afternoon counting session, with the first cool beer of the evening being front of mind, can’t you? The advent of the digital SLR changed all that and photos are now effectively free once the equipment has been purchased. But moving on from the photo, the analysis is far from free, as skilled analysts have to pore over tens of thousands of images – in our case here – a large park, taken from just 300m above ground. Three or four analysts with large computer screens will take two to three months to go through each and every photo, manually counting the animals seen in them while simultaneously differentiating between species. Easy when it’s differentiating between an elephant and a crocodile, but less so when trying to separate a bushbuck from a Uganda Kob. So, you need a Cessna aircraft at USD400 per hour to hire, Avgas (aeroplane petrol) at USD2 per litre (200 litres per day), a pilots salary, plus several counters to analyze thereafter obviously all cost money. The time delay factor in counting often makes data by default somewhat stale three months later.

Queen Elizabeth National Park aerial survey

So, in this age of tech, why isn’t there a better method to do all this? As Richard Lamprey, the pilot and biologist who took the photos you are seeing here as part of the recent Queen Elizabeth NP survey accepted when we spoke recently, tech is on the point of making him, his plane, his cameras and his analysts all redundant. He believes he will be the last generation of manual data collector and analyzer. So what’s coming next?

Latest Technologies for Aerial Surveys

Aerial surveys image

If the UAV’s are also fitted out with thermal equipment, individual heat signatures can be overlaid on to the standard JPEG photo to enhance accuracy, and probably even to allow night work to be done. So, from today’s processes as detailed above, in a few years’ time it looks likely that a cheap UAV, with almost limitless airtime between landings, will be flying pre-determined transects, photographing game with impossibly powerful cameras.

This data will be instantly geo-referenced, transmitted to a base receiver on mother earth, sent via the internet to the receiving computer, analyzed and the data made available in whatever spreadsheet format is required. Almost instantaneously.

As for Richard, he won’t have to think about that cold beer awaiting him at the end of a day’s flying for much longer. He will already be on the ground next to his redundant Cessna, beer in hand, watching the machine that has taken over his job flying overhead. Such is the relentless progress of technological advancement.